the dilemma of transfers.

when superstars make moves to different leagues, the first question that pops in our head is whether they would continue to walk the walk besides just talking the talk. while those like zidane, beckham etc. continue to thrive, theres a huge list of players whom fail to perform. yes, schevchenko, we still remember you. ballack, you, too.

ive always been hearing commentators blaming these failed transfers to the adaptation inability of these world class players. i do believe it is a factor simply because being a footballer myself, the opponents' overall style of play do affect our performances. the swarming physical defense posted up by the americans versus the out wide possession buildups of europeans. they do make a difference. but to me, i think this is not the whole picture.

the more critical factor, i believe, is the the style of play of their new TEAMS rather than the new LEAGUES. if these aces had stellar performances in the cl and uefa cup against teams from all over, "weird" opposing styles alone are not enough and are not going to choke them up. heres 3 failed examples in 3 different league transfers:

1) one of my favorite players, mendieta of valencia. not enough play time in lazio, dip i confidence, lack of runs from teammates, inability to make plays etc.



2) veron screwing up in manchester. by the end of it, he could barely do a proper corner. too much of a traditional midfielders to be in the bpl. much like what riquelme is.



3) cannavaro losing his dominance within 2 months of his worldcup/footballer of the year performances. lack of support from the midfield. renders his early tackles into dangerous defensive maneuvers.